Alexandra Bösch

lic. iur., Rechtsanwältin

Partnerin

boesch@b-legal.ch

V-Card

Ausbildung und Erfahrung

  • Senior Liability Underwriter im internationalen Unternehmensgeschäft eines führenden Schweizer Erstversicherers (1990-1998)
  • Eidg. Berufsprüfung für Privatversicherungsfachleute (1995)
  • Rechtswissenschaftliches Studium an der Universität Zürich (1996-2001)
  • Legal Claims Counsel bei Swiss Re New Markets (2001/2002)
  • Auditorin m.b.A. am Bezirksgericht Meilen (2002/2003)
  • Rechtsanwaltspatent (2004)
  • Rechtsanwältin bei Badertscher Rechtsanwälte AG seit 2005 – Partnerin seit 2009

Sprachen

  • Deutsch
  • Englisch
  • Französisch

Mitgliedschaften

  • Zürcher Anwaltsverband (ZAV)
  • Schweizerischer Anwaltsverband (SAV)
  • Schweiz. Vereinigung der diplomierten Versicherungsfachleute (ASDA)
  • Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht (SGHVR)
  • Mitglied und aufgeführte Anwältin bei Who’s Who Legal

Publikationen

Amended rules on insurance supervision

Amended rules on insurance supervision

Amended rules on insurance supervision. The revised Insurance Supervisory Law has been in effect since January 1 2006. The need for further revision has been revealed through lessons learned from the global economic and financial crisis and the introduction of risk-based solvency measuring methods including:
the Swiss Solvency Test;
the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority’s 2011 equivalence test; and
l the Financial Sector Assessment Programme of the International Monetary Fund’s 2013 analysis.

mehr lesen
Nanotechnology – can insurance play a role in regulation?

Nanotechnology – can insurance play a role in regulation?

Nanotechnology – can insurance play a role in regulation? Nanomaterials are often referred to as the key technology of the 21st century. However, the effects of nanoparticles, especially in the long term, are unknown due to a lack of scientific data. This uncertainty represents a major challenge for both the legislature and the insurance industry if they play a role in regulation.

mehr lesen
Supreme Court decides on ambiguous clauses in general insurance term

Supreme Court decides on ambiguous clauses in general insurance term

Supreme Court decides on ambiguous clauses in general insurance terms. The Federal Supreme Court recently issued a decision(1) on the rule of ambiguity in the context of the interpretation of general insurance terms. The court found that a provision which excludes accidents as a result of the deliberate causation of a crime or offence is neither considered unusual nor ambiguous, and can therefore be validly be relied upon by the insurer.

mehr lesen